A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of setting up breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children household. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such spots are matter to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above Irish Times article about René Collier that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.